Die Götter des Hradschin (German Edition)
Here the violin's virtuosity reaches its apex, and Schubert's expert writing, accumulating in quick succession Spiccato, Staccato, Pizzicato, etc. This brilliant writing, spectacular in the best sense, never prevents the music from retaining the highest level of inspiration and poetic delicacy. A fourth variation, hardly begun, very freely leads over to an abridged return of the opening Andante. The Fantasy ends with a bright and sturdy stretto Presto. The Three Sonatinas Op. To the nonperforming music-friend, they make ideal listening on CD, the more so since their public hearings are infrequent.
These first attempts at instrumental duet writing by a nineteen-year-old composer show perfect command of the medium and a true sense of genuine chamber music. The texture is crystal-clear, well balanced and effective. Schubert's exclusive admiration for Mozart seemingly made him overlook the existence of Beethoven's ten violin sonatas, by then all completed and published, for there is no trace of their influence to be found here.
Whereas the first sonata or rather sonatina, as we shall call them from now on, by common consent has only three movements, the other two include a Minuet but not a Scherzo. The formal structure remains very classical as far as the first and third sonatinas are concerned, but the second, in many ways the most interesting and individual of the set allows itself greater freedom in this respect.
Sonatina in D Major, Op. The work stresses its relationship to the sphere of the eighteenth century by its long-since obsolete heading "Sonata for Piano forte with the accompaniment of a Violin", an indication which corresponds to no reality in the present case. Next comes an Andante in A major, of truly Mozartean tenderness, and this, as in the two remaining sonatinas, constitutes the work's heart and climax. Sonatina in A Minor, Op. Whereas the two other sonatinas start with a unison statement of both instruments introducing the main theme, this one entrusts it to the piano alone.
The violin, entering at bar ten, at once plays a very free amplification of it, its melodic leaps reaching an extent of two octaves. The very lyrical and songful Andante in F major, again the most significant of the four movements, shows the influence of the Lied element, ever present in Schubert's instrumental music. The central section in A-flat has some beautiful and delicate modulations. The Minuet with the marking Allegro is a sturdy and strongly rhythmical piece, much more so than the corresponding movement of the G minor work.
It boasts a beguiling Trio, where the key changes from the foregoing D minor into B-flat major. The concluding Allegro is planned on a fairly large scale, based upon the contrast between a tenderly elegiac melody and a lively theme in lilting triplets. The minor mode is maintained to the end. Sonatina in G Minor, Op. The passionate and lively movement is followed by an Andante in E-flat major, slim and winding in its unfolding, and whose intensely lyrical middle section, with its unspeakable poetic feeling and bewitching harmonic turns make it the climax of the three sonatinas.
A very elegant Minuet, whose songful Trio is of the rarest beauty, and a brilliant and lively Allegro moderato, sometimes recalling Weber in a most curious and unexpected way, complete the beguiling work. Rondo Brillant in B Minor, Op. The artists were young violinist Joseph Slavik and Schubert's own friend C. Slavik, then only twenty, was an extraordinary virtuoso, known as "the Czech Paganini," and who might well have superseded the famous Italian, his senior by a full generation, but for his untimely death at the age of twenty-seven, only five years after Schubert's.
Indeed, his stupendous technique, said to equal Paganini's, was matched by an intensity of feeling not often to be found in the latter's playing. Bocklet, himself a fine musician, was Slavik's regular accompanist, and this is how Schubert, still fighting hard to obtain recognition at large even though he had already reached the apex of his brief career, found an unhoped for opportunity to entrust a celebrated virtuoso with two first performances. These circumstances help to explain the brilliant writing and spectacular style of both works, which require the highest technical proficiency from both the violinist and the pianist.
The critics' reception, very probably shared by that of the public, was very different from one piece to the other, and for quite obvious reasons inherent in the character of the music itself: whereas the Rondeau was well received, the Fantasy, owing to its length, complexity, boldness and problematic form, met with misunderstanding and general perplexity.
The Rondo brillant was written during the last weeks of , just after Schubert had completed the last and greatest of his fifteen string quartets, Op. There was a private premiere at the publisher Artaria's, early in , and the reception was so favorable that Artaria printed the piece soon thereafter. The understanding and relevant reviews stressed the beauty, the novelty and strength of inspiration, even underlining "the charm of shifting harmonies".
The actual Rondo is preceded by a majestic Andante introduction of some fifty bars, unfolding itself in spacious ternary form, and underlining its pathetic grandeur by solemn dotted rhythms and by rich romantic modulations. The lively and playful Rondo is based on a theme of a strong Hungarian flavor, such as Schubert had brought back from his two stays with the Esterhazy family at Zelesz witness the Divertissement a la Hongroise for Piano Four Hands, Op.
The music develops with ever new inspiration, perhaps reaching the high point of expressive beauty in the ravishing lyrical episode in G major, the heart of. A bright and triumphant flourish in B major brings the Rondo to an exultant end. Every beginner knows the three charming sonatinas for violin and piano in Op. For the next seven yearsa long time in his short life- there were no further duets for piano and another solo instrument.
In he composed two such works which are of considerable interest, one being the Sonata for Cello and Piano in A Minor, D. His trios are, in any case, quite similar to those by Beethoven. Both have four movements — of which three are in the tonic key — and use the piano as its leading instrument. Both composers wrote trios that were intended for performances in relatively small environments mostly big houses owned by aristocrats and rich citizens and which greatly expanded the limitations of the genre and its small space.
The piano parts are much more virtuosic than those of its most famous predecessors Haydn and Mozart , and the string parts show a range of dynamics and emotions that prove that Schubert was on the border between Classicism and Romanticism. The second trio is even longer and more demanding. Although it is now unfashionable to describe music in these genderrelated terms, the differences between both trios are great and obvious, just like the similarities. Schubert, unlike Beethoven, is not very interested in small motives that are almost endlessly transformed in all kinds of directions.
He is much more a master of long melodic lines that he likes to repeat almost endlessly with slight variations which function as transitions between the sections of the piece. While Beethoven is a master of instrumental drama, Schubert is a master of lyricism. He often works with keys that are on the one hand far enough away to make the harmony sound adventurous and dream-like, and on the other close enough to maintain the sense of a solid harmonic centre.
Unlike Beethoven, who clearly emphasises in a phrase the strong and weak parts of the bar, Schubert tends to blur this distinction. Another difference between Schubert and his master is the treatment of counterpoint. Beethoven, like Bach, tends to show off his mastery in the form of complex and ingenious textures, difficult to play and to listen to. Schubert, by contrast, prefers to write beautiful melodies in eloquent dialogues. He felt aware of a contrapuntal deficiency and even decided to take lessons with the academician Simon Sechter during the last months of his life.
But the trios are not short of contrapuntal mastery, expressed within his own style. In the second movement of D, Schubert quotes a Swedish song that was doing the rounds of Vienna while he wrote his trio. It was often performed by a Swedish singer, Albert Berg, who sang it at parties and other occasions attended by the composer. Schubert himself never explicitly described the content of the piece and was perfectly aware of the idiosyncrasies of both vocal and instrumental music. In his final years, Schubert took to writing many expansive instrumental pieces, not just these trios.
But no matter how long these works sometimes were, they had to fit within a multimovement composition. This explains the fate of the Notturno D Schubert intended it to be the second movement of D, but apparently rejected it — perhaps on grounds of length and indeed expressive selfsufficiency. When both trios gained popularity in the concert hall, the Notturno proved to be an excellent encore.
It also explains the fate of the finale of D After the premiere, in March , Schubert decided to cut this last movement by a third. He asked his publisher to respect his decision, but we are not sure if Schubert saw the printed proof when it was sent to him. As a rule they were first performed in domestic circles with his father on the cello thus the cello parts are always quite easy , his two brothers Ferdinand and Ignaz on the violins and Schubert on the viola.
Schubert himself prepared the parts, which form some of the basis for modern editions. Indeed, whatever the participants wanted or needed would be written for any given musical gathering.
The First Trio was only published in , the Second much later, and both known only to connoisseurs. Chamber music also played a central role at the Stadtkonvikt, the imperialroyal city college that Schubert entered in as a chorister and where he received his basic musical training. It was here in the orchestra that he learned the standard repertoire of his time, including the symphonies of Haydn and Mozart.
Predictably, one finds numerous thematic references to those contemporary orchestral works in his early string quartets. Apparently Schubert did not distinguish between orchestral and chamber music in his early works, many of which exist in a variety of instrumentations. Through the use of double stops, octave doublings and tremolo, he strove for an orchestral sound in his chamber music — one can hear brass instruments in the numerous fanfares and different orchestral registers in the stark dynamic contrasts.
And when necessary, he simply orchestrated the works. His language was equally intriguing and showed, especially in his late and long instrumental compositions, a perfect control of architecture, phrasing, harmony, rhythm and melody. As so often recordings led the way: in this case the first recording of D, made by the pianist Alfred Cortot, violinist Jacques Thibaud and cellist Pablo Casals. The music has a vocal touch, but it could only have been written for instruments. It is solidly grounded in the Classical style, but the fluent melodies and the harmony, which often avoid clear marking points in the structure, anticipate the Romanticism of Brahms and indeed Mahler.
By the string quartet had divested itself of the influence of fashionable Rossinian opera. At the same time the new fortepiano was making its way into musical salons. The market for printed quartet music collapsed, just as Schubert was seeking, without success, to have his first works published. It was not until that he attempted his next composition for quartet: a single movement Quartettsatz D A turning point came in with the return to Vienna of the violinist Ignaz Schuppanzigh, who resumed his quartet concerts, primarily of music by the Viennese Classicists.
Schubert immediately set to composing a series of three works. Of these no more than a handful have remained in the repertoire. Schubert would not have regretted this. Just before he composed his final group of three quartets, he distanced himself from his earlier efforts, which are far more relaxed in mood and do not attempt the control of large-scale form, or the expressive depth, melancholy and drama that mark his music from roughly onwards.
Yet it is exciting to observe and hear how, beginning in , the year-old composer found his own way to the quartet, a path fully independent of his contemporaries. Vienna around the turn of the 19th century was the city for the string quartet. Some works published by odd composers bear witness to the boom. The string quartet was the fashionable medium for domestic musicmaking, and so it was that many composers wrote pieces which could be played by amateur musicians and therefore sold well.
There were virtuosic works as well, presented mainly by violinists in the increasingly popular public concerts of the day. Only a few composers like Beethoven held fast to their high artistic ideals without concern for the performability or accessibility of their music. Schubert, too, was not catering for the general public in his early works. In his lyrical A minor Quartet and its dramatic D minor companion piece, in the G major Quartet with its references to Beethoven and in the Quintet as a great all-encompassing finale, Schubert achieved a richness of possibilities and perspectives that showed how the genre could further develop and progress after or beside Beethoven.
The opening movement already combines melodic beauty with a constant underlying nervous seething. Moreover, the abrupt harmonic shifts and the play with musical expanses clearly point towards Romanticism and show how far Schubert, in spite of all of his ties to Classical models, sought from the outset to distance himself from them. It is impressive to observe how the year-old develops an opening movement out of very simple, formulaic material, taking sonata form to its limits by constantly varying his themes — not just in the development section — and, especially, shedding new harmonic light on them.
In the final movement he also comes close to tossing out the Haydnesque design while approaching the orchestral sonorities so characteristic of his early quartets through double stopping and chains of trills. The Andante in C major poses many questions. There are similarities to the corresponding movements of D32 and D An almost identical piano version D29 survives, for which the year of composition has been narrowed down to , and from which we have been able to reconstruct a playable complete version for quartet.
His earlier contributions to the genre, on the other hand, still occupy a somewhat shadowy existence, although it is exciting to observe and to hear how the year-old Schubert carved out his own path in quartet-writing from , completely independently from the works of his contemporaries. Vienna around was the city of the string quartet, as approximately printed works by around 70 composers bear testimony. The genre was very much in fashion for the purposes of domestic music-making, which led many composers to write works that could be played by amateurs and so were easy to sell.
At the same time, virtuoso pieces were being composed which enabled violinists of the time to display their talents at the increasingly popular public concerts. Only a few composers, such as Beethoven, stubbornly maintained their high artistic standards irrespective of how easy their works were to perform, or how hummable they were. Schubert was not targeting the general public with his early quartets either. Chamber music also played a big part in the Stadtkonvikt imperial seminary , which Schubert joined in as a boy treble, receiving his basic musical education there.
- Gynecological Cancer Management: Identification, Diagnosis and Treatment?
- The Outlaw Adept (The Third Soul Book 6)?
- Author: Various!
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Volume 4, Slice 2 - "Bohemia" to "Borgia, Francis"?
- Joe Tait: Its Been a Real Ball.
- Gaschen Niklaus - AbeBooks;
The opening Overture in B D is a unique composition in that there are no other known overtures for string quartet by any other composer. Schubert makes no distinction between orchestral and chamber music in his early works; by using double-stopping, unison playing and tremolo he attempts to realise the same sonic ideas in his early chamber works as he was aiming for in his orchestral works.
Numerous fanfares suggest woodwind to the listener, and strong dynamic contrasts imply the differing registers of the orchestra. The alternation of chamber style and orchestral passages also enables far greater room for contrasts. It was in fact common at the time for symphonies or entire operas to be played in arrangements for string quartet in the domestic family context.
Only the short central section remains of the version for string quartet: whether the rest has been lost, or else was never written at all, is unknown. For this recording, a playable version was reconstructed from the orchestral score. Composed in , it clearly shows Schubert still searching for the right response to the quartets of the Viennese masters.
The opening movement in particular, stringing together short phrases and hackneyed flourishes, sudden interruptions and rapid shifts in character, gives a very disconnected and uneven impression — perhaps explained by the fact that Schubert wrote it in a mere four and a half hours.
Around the string quartet gave way in the fashion stakes to Italian opera in the style of Rossini, and at the same time the new fortepiano became a fixture in domestic music salons. Thus the market for quartet scores was in a state of collapse at the time Schubert was trying to get his first works published — including his latest Quartet in E D, which its publisher later accorded the posthumous opus number No.
Only in the Minuet does Schubert experiment with different phrase lengths, provoking the listener with repeated surprises. It was not until that the return of violinist Ignaz Schuppanzigh to Vienna, after years of touring, brought a change, the virtuoso resuming his quartet recitals dedicated to the Viennese classics. Similarly, his great G major quartet, D, was also left to gather dust, as was his unique String Quintet D, whose performance and subsequent triumph Schubert was never to witness.
Nevertheless, with his lyrical A minor quartet, its dramatic sister piece in D minor, his Beethovenian G major quartet and the Quintet as a great, all-encompassing summation, Schubert essentially bequeathed a multitude of possibilities and potential indicators of how the quartet genre might have evolved alongside and after Beethoven. In northeastern Europe there are wars of independence against Napoleon, but little trace of that is felt in Vienna. In the vineyards outside the city gates the wine is flowing, there is revelling — and, naturally, dancing.
In this festive atmosphere the Schubert family quartet gathers once again: Franz Schubert plays the viola alongside his brothers Ferdinand and Ignaz on violins and his father on cello. As is often the case, beginning with the Quartet D18, Schubert has written a new work for the occasion. His sparse indications often allow only conjecture. And why did he paste over two of the movements with a newer version?
Did he intend to use the material for an orchestral work, and therefore replaced both polychoral movements with simpler, though no less charming, alternatives? Did his strict father criticise the highly decorative writing, or did he not much care for the pieces? The movements that Schubert composed subsequently are included at the end of the CD as a bonus. This way the listener can decide for themselves whether the newer version of the third minuet should be given pride of place as a meditative point of repose, or its original, strongly contrasting predecessor with two trios; or whether the triplet motion of the original trio in the fifth German dance offers a more alluring invitation to the dance than the melody doubled in octaves on the two violins in the later version.
That they were not meant to accompany dancing is clear from obstacles such as the heavy chords in the first trio.
The diversity and uninterrupted flow of new ideas in the dances are remarkable: there are Spanish rhythms, Baroque-like chains of suspensions, simple, songlike movements, minuets in the finest Haydn style, and, above all, trios marked by ripely Romantic sonorities. It is also astonishing how elegant and salonlike the minuets seem — genuinely old-fashioned dances — when juxtaposed against the rather coarser, more modern German dances. That his first attempts at composition were songs and instrumental pieces is thus not surprising.
In his first Quartet D18, the year-old was understandably still seeking to master form and content and thus often experimenting with them. Moving between C minor and D minor, the slow introduction only slowly settles on the key of G minor for the main movement. His feeling for large arcs of tension seems to demand other resources and means.
That explains why, in addition to passages of idiomatic chamber writing, there are many octave doublings, multiple-stopped chords and tremolos that one would more likely expect to find in an orchestral work. Quotations from or formal analogies to contemporary orchestral works show how he sought to develop his own individual style while using established models and themes as a basis. At the same time, the thematically simple fugues in the opening and final movements of D18 show relatively little imagination, recalling the fugal quartets of Johann Georg Albrechtsberger, which had fallen somewhat out of fashion.
They demonstrate the extent to which Schubert sought to master basic compositional techniques. The two middle movements are modelled more on Joseph Haydn: the minuet, with its con sordino sonorities, is especially beautiful, while also surprising the listener with its irregular phrase lengths. An unusual and compositionally extreme approach is found in the two Quartet Movements D It is fascinating to observe the way in which Schubert constructs these two long movements out of very little motivic material.
The smallest — at first seemingly unimportant — rhythmic patterns suddenly take on significance, and Schubert extends them into quasirhythmicised sound surfaces in which he further develops the harmony. The rhythmic energy of these motifs constantly infuses the writing with impulses that keep it ebbing and then pressing ahead. Even though Schubert did not make such extreme use of it in his other early quartets, these sound surfaces represent a forwardlooking compositional technique that reappears, in a more sophisticated form, in his late quartets.
The absence of expansive melodies in these two movements lends them a somewhat brittle character. Although the final movement, reminiscent of Haydn, has a catchy rondo theme, again it is made up of short motivic particles. Furthermore, it owes some of its memorability to popping up a little too often around the three corresponding development sections.
In terms of technical means D and have a lot in common, but their characters differ greatly. D is dominated by drama and tragedy. Drama of this intensity was not new for Schubert it can be found in some of his early songs , but the scale of it is unprecedented; no wonder Mahler was sufficiently impressed to make his own version for string orchestra. The second movement, just as in the quartet D, has a vocal source: in this case the song Death and the Maiden D, written in Schubert uses its melody as a theme for a set of variations.
The steady beat is enriched with adventurous harmonies, though most of the variations follow the conservative practice of assigning the most elaborate part to the first violin — the other movements dispose their parts much more equally. The third is a spiky scherzo, underlined by unexpected harmonic changes.
By contrast the Trio is an idyllic intermezzo, making the Scherzo unusually long. This juxtaposition of violent outbursts and peaceful intimacy attracted the Expressionist artists around the first decades of the following century, who were drawn to raw expressions of deep emotion but within a. The finale clearly shows the difference between Schubert and Beethoven. Beethoven emphasises the rhythmic energy; Schubert the mellowness and the lyricism that results from the long presence of the same key. It has the form of a rondo with a tarantella rhythm. Suspending the tension, Schubert interrupts the finale with a serene chorale, before the dance-like theme returns with unstoppable momentum.
The seeds of the late quartets which would not be undertaken for another four years yet can be traced in this all-too-brief first movement — brief, yes, but overflowing with melodic invention and harmonic ingenuity. Before long, we reach the second group — a drop to the flat submediant, A flat, for a lyrical theme which suddenly turns to the minor for a stormy transitory section.
The modulatory passage at the head of the working-out section introduces yet more melodic material, all the while haunted by the shadow of the opening motif, and ushers in a reprise of the lyrical theme — in B flat, leading to E flat. The stormy transitory material now leads to the fourth tune in the tonic major which, as the cello accompaniment fades, is interrupted at last by the opening figure, this time serving as a coda, bringing the movement to a highly provisional C minor close.
A slow movement exists to follow the Quartettsatz, but it is in a fragmentary state that precludes performance. But why did Schubert not complete the quartet? Ideas apparently came to him in such abundance that he felt compelled to move on. Composed when Schubert was just 23 years old, the Quartettsatz turned out to be a stepping stone to the greater heights of the chamber music of his last five years.
Quartet D CD15 The opening bars suggest the concert hall rather than an intimate domestic venue. This is not just a matter of technical difficulty, although as a whole the G major Quartet is extremely hard to play. It is more a question of the size of the gesture — a modern comparison might aptly be made between the stage movements necessary in live theatre and the smaller ones called for by television, to be relayed to the privacy of the home. The Octet may, of course, be louder, but by the nature of its gestures it never goes beyond the bounds of domestic music-making. Even so it would be a mistake to assume that the whole of this quartet is conducted in the grand manner.
The size of gesture varies considerably and to gauge this variation challenges more than mere virtuosity. In the first paragraph of the A minor Quartet, A major appeared as a false consolation. Here the procedure is not only reversed major now becomes minor , but the two modes are compressed into a single, awkward, dramatic expostulation. The energy thus built up is expended in an athletic dotted phrase, a silence and an echo.
These four ideas expostulation, answer, silence, echo occupy five bars instead of the conventional four.
MissWatson reads and ROOTS | ROOT Challenge - (Read Our Own Tomes) | LibraryThing
It is also far from easy to pick out the underlying triple pulse. Only at bar 15 does this come out into the open and even here a tremolando has replaced the traditional accompanying figure. Such figures, in the works of Haydn especially, often held thematic or rhythmic potential. The tremolando sacrifices these possibilities in the interests of maintaining atmosphere.
The lower strings must allow the first violin its tune, but their support must also ensure that the continuity is not broken. One of the most notable. Almost the only rhythmic respite comes from the return of the opening gesture; now the chords go minor-major, there are no athletic dots, no tremolando. Is there a simple equation that identifies minor as disruptive, major as placatory? The coda provides some sort of answer. Schubert follows his usual path in the slow movement. That is, he gives us a beautiful tune, throws everything against it, and beauty eventually wins out.
Two refinements of this procedure deserve mention. An abrupt but constant two-note figure on violin and viola is pitted against a changing series of tremolando chords on all four instruments. Perhaps unexpectedly, the abrupt little figure actually wins — the poet bends the world to his will. The second refinement is that much of the beauty of the tune is enshrined in the timbre of the cello, playing high on the A string and always the original minor version of the tune.
The first violin is allowed a version in the tonic major E major and even in the dominant minor, but E minor is strictly reserved for the cello. The Scherzo and finale proceed almost entirely in small gestures and at high speed. Time again we glimpse the spirit of Haydn, who knew very well what marvels could be conjured from repeated notes on strings. To gain an impression of the atmosphere at the time we can take a look at the Congress of Vienna that this statesman organised in Aristocracy and statesmen from all over Europe were in attendance, accompanied by their wives and courtiers.
The meetings were not only political. There was also entertainment in the form of balls and concerts. The whole affair took place in the upper echelons of society— a small, privileged group. No-one would have noticed Franz Schubert. One composer who did make an impression was the previously mentioned Johann Nepomuk Hummel. He composed countless waltzes for the gala evenings of the Congress. They were lightweight pieces that were quickly forgotten. Not so fleeting was the Piano Septet op.
The work was performed often and was discussed in leading newspapers. Hummel arranged the work for piano quintet in the same year, using the combination of violin, viola, cello, bass and fortepiano. The arrangement was given the same opus number, Hummel had previously composed a quintet for this combination in the Piano Quintet in E-flat. This work was not published until , under the opus number In Schubert found himself broke, once again.
Schubert stayed with a local lawyer. Once back in Vienna, Schubert set to work and the result was an extensive, fivemovement work. The parts were copied by Stadler, a friend of Schubert,. Schubert was 22 when he composed the Trout Quintet. During his lifetime only a few of his songs, some dance music, and a few works for piano duet were published. He wrote to publishers and sent them his quintet but there was little interest in the unknown composer. Shortly after their marriage, they moved to Augsburg , where he became a citizen and a member of the Master's Guild.
One of his best-known students was Johann Schmidtner. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article may be expanded with text translated from the corresponding article in Italian. May Click [show] for important translation instructions. Machine translation like Deepl or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. Diese endet in der psychiatrischen Klinik in Bern. Inspiriert durch die erste der zehn Duineser Elegien von Rainer Maria Rilke setzt er sich nun ein weiteres Mal an seinen Laptop, schrei b t diesmal ganz bewusst, aber auch schon sehr ironisch in und an die Luft - diesmal ohne die geringste Erwartung.
Dieser bildet den Anfangspunkt der abgehandelten Dynamik, so wie der Sonnengesang dessen Schlusspunkt darstellt. Gleichsam in den Mittelstimmen durchgetragen. Neuware - Sirkka-Leena Koskela, geb. Im vorliegenden Buch wendet sie sich erstmals einem Schriftsteller und Philosophen zu, der mit seinem immensen Oeuvre bisher leider vollkommen unbekannt geblieben ist.
Item added to your basket View basket.
Proceed to Basket. View basket. Continue shopping. United Kingdom. Search Within These Results:.
Johann Heinrich Schönfeld
Bergisch Gladbach, Germany Seller Rating:. Seller Image. Eine Frau am Fenster : Gesammelte Kurzprosa. Schalmeien aus Moskau : Ein Mann in Versuchung. Schumann: Zwei letzte Klavierwerke. Jetzt umdenken!