GIVE ME Jesus : Embracing the Man Who is the Authentic Christ
Do we pray for their conversion? Make reparation? Are we apostolic? Where is our counseling? Our argumentation? Our charity? Where is our fearless and energetic defense of the truths that they deny or insult? The Sacred Heart of Jesus bleeds because of this. It bleeds for the apostasies of these souls and for our indifference, an indifference that is twice guilty because it is indifferent to our neighbor and, first and foremost, to God. How many souls around the world are losing their faith?
Consider the endless numbers of impious newspapers and magazines, broadcasts and films, that flood the world daily. Consider the innumerable workers of Satan who, in academia, in the bosom of the family, in meeting rooms, in places of entertainment, propagate impious ideas. The consequences are before us. Institutions, customs, and art are becoming ever more de-Christianized, an undeniable indication that the entire world is losing God. Is there not some great scheme in all of this? Can so many articulate and uniform methods, united in their objectives and development, be merely coincidental?
Since when have spontaneous motions concertedly produced the most complete, organized, extensive, ingenious, and formidable ideological offensive in history, fully consistent in its essence, its goals, and its development? We sleep the heavy sleep of our daily lives. Why are we not more vigilant? The Church suffers greatly, but alone. Far from Her, very far from Her, we slumber. The scene in the Garden of Olives is repeated. But what use do we make of it? Do we love it? Do we understand that our greatest happiness in life consists in being members of the holy Church, that our greatest glory is the title of Christian?
If we respond in the affirmative — and how rare are those who, in good conscience, could so respond — are we ready to make every sacrifice in order to preserve our faith? Before answering with a romantic yes, let us take a moment to examine our consciences honestly. Do we ever seek occasions that might put our faith at risk?
Do we enjoy worldly pleasures that are — at best — indifferent to it? Do we read or view materials that violate its standards? Do we welcome the company of those who disregard or even disparage it? Yes, the passage even tells us to pay our taxes.
Jesus: God’s Tangible Sign
The only time we have permission to disobey authority is when submitting to that authority means we would be disobeying God. The story of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego tells of three young Hebrew captives who were determined to worship and obey God above all others. When King Nebuchadnezzar commanded the people to fall down and worship a golden image he had built, these three men refused. Courageously they stood before the king who pressured them to deny God or face death in a fiery furnace.
When Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego chose to obey God above the king, they didn't know with certainty that God would rescue them from the flames, but they stood firm anyway. And God delivered them, miraculously. God opened a tremendous door of opportunity through the obedience of his three brave servants. What a powerful witness of God's power to Nebuchadnezzar and the people of Babylon. In our eagerness to be witnesses for Christ, we often rush ahead of God.
Only by seeking the Lord in prayer are we led through doors that God alone can open. Only by prayer will our witnessing have the desired effect. The great Apostle Paul knew a thing or two about effective witnessing. He gave us this trustworthy advice:. Hodges, D. Encyclopedia of Illustrations: Signs of the Times p.
Share Flipboard Email. Mary Fairchild is a full-time Christian minister, writer, and editor of two Christian anthologies, including "Stories of Cavalry. Updated February 19, Here are five practical approaches to being a better representative of the gospel. Jesus taught us to how to share the gospel by showing our love to others in John As I have loved you, so you must love one another.
By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another. Now about your love for one another we do not need to write to you, for you yourselves have been taught by God to love each other. Yet we urge you, brothers and sisters, to do so more and more, and to make it your ambition to lead a quiet life: You should mind your own business and work with your hands, just as we told you, so that your daily life may win the respect of outsiders and so that you will not be dependent on anybody.
- THE MEANS.
- Origine du prénom Agénor (Oeuvres courtes) (French Edition).
- Intrinsic Coincidences My Short Story Memoir.
Now Daniel so distinguished himself among the administrators and the satraps by his exceptional qualities that the king planned to set him over the whole kingdom. At this, the administrators and the satraps tried to find grounds for charges against Daniel in his conduct of government affairs, but they were unable to do so. They could find no corruption in him, because he was trustworthy and neither corrupt nor negligent. Finally these men said, "We will never find any basis for charges against this man Daniel unless it has something to do with the law of his God.
As a result, the ungodly king declared:.
- The Most Pleasant and Delectable Questions of Love (The Unabridged Original English Translation).
- Embracing Christ and the Cross?
- How to Be a Disciple of Christ.
- How to Share Your Faith in God With Others.
- 1. Joy–at pleasing His Father.;
- Islands of Love and War.
- Alfabet van die voëls (Afrikaans Edition).
- Lucky Luke - Volume 8 - Calamity Jane: 08;
- Rmnce (The Rmnce Series).
She told the collector she would need an expert papyrologist to authenticate the fragment by hand, along with more details about its legal status and history. You hardly want to send a letter in the mail! It was part of a batch of Greek and Coptic papyri that he said he had purchased in the late s from one H.
Jesus embraced His humanity to give us salvation | Rhode Island Catholic
Laukamp, of Berlin. Among the papers the collector had sent King was a typed letter to Laukamp from July from Peter Munro. Munro was a prominent Egyptologist at the Free University Berlin and a longtime director of the Kestner Museum, in Hannover, for which he had acquired a spectacular, 3,year-old bust of Akhenaten.
Laukamp had apparently consulted Munro about his papyri, and Munro wrote back that a colleague at the Free University, Gerhard Fecht, an expert on Egyptian languages and texts, had identified one of the Coptic papyri as a second-to fourth-century A. The collector also left King an unsigned and undated handwritten note that appears to belong to the same correspondence—this one concerning a different gospel.
Fecht is of the opinion that this could be evidence for a possible marriage. They simply may not have been interested. Neither, necessarily, would have Laukamp. Manuscript dealers tend to worry most about financial value, and attitudes differ about whether publication helps or hinders. For legal purposes, however, the date of the correspondence was crucial, though it — along with the fact that Laukamp, Fecht and Munro were all dead — may well strike critics as suspiciously convenient.
The next year, Egypt would revise its antiquities law to declare that all discoveries after were the unequivocal property of the Egyptian government. Though King can read Coptic and has worked with papyrus manuscripts, she is by training a historian of religion. To authenticate the fragment, she would need outside help.
A few weeks before the collector came to Harvard, King forwarded the photos to AnneMarie Luijendijk, a professor at Princeton and an authority on Coptic papyri and sacred scriptures. King had overseen her doctoral dissertation at Harvard. Bagnall serves tea, coffee and cookies, and projects images of papyri under discussion onto a screen in his living room. The flow of ink was highly irregular.
Bible Study Book
The Sahidic dialect of Coptic and the style of the handwriting, with letters whose tails do not stray above or below the line, reminded Luijendijk of texts from Nag Hammadi and elsewhere and helped her and Bagnall date the fragment to the second half of the fourth century A. The fragment is some four centimeters tall and eight centimeters wide. Its rough edges suggest that it had been cut out of a larger manuscript; some dealers, keener on profit than preservation, will dice up texts for maximum return.
The presence of writing on both sides convinced the scholars that it was part of a codex—or book—rather than a scroll. But with so little surrounding text, what might it mean? Into what backdrop did it fit? Some of the phrases echoed, if distantly, passages in Luke, Matthew and the Gnostic gospels about the role of family in the life of disciples. The parallels convinced King that this gospel was originally composed, most likely in Greek, in the second century A. In the weeks leading up to the mid-September announcement, King worried that people would read the headlines and misconstrue her paper as an argument that the historical Jesus was married.
For King, the text on the papyrus fragment is something else: fresh evidence of the diversity of voices in early Christianity. The first claims of Jesus' celibacy did not appear until about a century after his death. Clement of Alexandria, a theologian and Church father who lived from A. They proudly say that they are imitating the Lord who neither married or had any possession in this world, boasting that they understand the gospel better than anyone else.
I first met King in early September at a restaurant on Beacon Street, a short walk from her office. When she arrived, looking a little frazzled, she apologized. Unlike Bagnall and Luijendijk, who had viewed the actual papyrus, the reviewer was working off low-resolution photographs. After getting nods from Luijendijk, Bagnall and another anonymous peer reviewer, King had considered the question of authenticity settled.
If she could not do so soon, she told me, she would have to call off plans to announce the discovery, at an international conference on Coptic studies, in Rome. The date of her paper there, September 18, was just two weeks away. She and the owner had already agreed that the papyrus remain available at Harvard after publication for examination by other specialists—and for good reason.
Come on. So many students were filing in that King had to ask the latecomers to heft chairs in from a neighboring classroom. When the baton passed to the professor, she kept it simple; her reputation, it seemed, preceded her. I like it. Harvard established its divinity school in as the first—and still one of the few—nonsectarian theological schools in the country, and its pioneering, sometimes iconoclastic scholarship has made it an object of suspicion among orthodox religious institutions.
Students come from a raft of religious backgrounds, including some 30 different Christian denominations; the largest single constituency, King said, is Roman Catholic women, whose Church denies them the priesthood. For King, being on the outside looking in is a familiar vantage. Her father was the town pharmacist, who made house calls at all hours of the night.
Her mother took care of the children—King is the second of four—taught home economics at the high school and raised horses.
I liked reading and ideas. And intellectually, the Episcopal Church was where the ideas were. A turning point was a class on Gnosticism, taught by John D. Turner, an authority on the Nag Hammadi discoveries.
She met her husband, Norman Cluley, a structural engineer, on a jogging path in Providence. Was she still a practicing Christian? Her faith, she said, had sustained her through a life-threatening, three-year bout with cancer that went into full remission in , after radiation and seven surgeries. She told me that she attends services, irregularly, at an Episcopal Church down the block from her home, in Arlington, a town northwest of Cambridge.
I use its materials when I think about ethics and politics.